GD450- I wonder whether the lower pps helps the management to show an artificially better performance on net loss. I remember the Dr having said that a higher pps leads to higher warrants related cost and hence the lower pps suits the management. This way they keep getting their stock options and money through dilution and yet show the net loss to be lower, thereby managing to hide the inefficiency in their operations.
High expenses has been a problem with APDN. Revenues are not ramping up exponentially to justify the higher expenses.
Ahh a year ago when the pump and dump was in full swing! Couple things wrong with your thought process.
First off our revenues were half of where we're at right now. By the time the share price gets to 23 cents again we could be quadruple what we had in 2013 at the time that you are referring to. We are already on track to more than double revenues year over year. That has a tremendous positive impact on any net loss we report which you are overlooking completely. And there is no sign we are slowing down but rather ramping up quicker than ever.
So my point is you cant just say our liabilities (warrants) are going to increase in the future as our share price does and not also admit the fact that our revenues will be growing as well which will offset these liabilities. Our revenue WILL offset warrant liabilities and OTHER liabilities which are just as much as the warrants right now!
Our net loss has decreased by a substantial amount! If we had a ZERO net loss would you be upset?!?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
