I think the sup info details are inconsistent with the details you point out from the body of the annual. Who knows which is correct? VG really needs to get its reporting together - it's not rocket science.
As you say, if there is actually a fixed conversion price of $0.367 it would be a great outcome for VG. But why would T&T have agreed to this? As Mr Negative, I'll assume that the sup info is correct until further notice.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
