InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Belgie24

04/29/14 6:43 PM

#19455 RE: TMLonggun #19454

Hi TML, outstanding analysis! Thank you.
icon url

mortalmyth

04/29/14 7:41 PM

#19456 RE: TMLonggun #19454

TMLonggun, I'd have to say your estimate is quite reasonable for what we see at this time for LODE.

In my mind $750 CATM is very shabby and is equivalent (rough estimate) to $1000 cash cost per ounce which is (roughly equivalent) to $1250 all in sustaining cost per ounce.


Have a good one.
icon url

silverlake

04/29/14 9:48 PM

#19457 RE: TMLonggun #19454

I guess time will tell the tale on this one.

I don't share your belief that cash flow will be so anemic, it will cause an eventual capital raise in the coming quarter(s). This outfit does a great deal of planning and has delivered thus far in a
very difficult precious metals climate; not to mention their NIMBY issues.

I think that they're well aware of cash flow and have aligned their commitments with the ramp-up in production. The latest credit facility's repayments don't begin until third quarter, which is when I believe Corrado implied in the Call today, production rates would increase significantly.

If the POG drops much further though, all bets are off...


icon url

stocktrader1

04/30/14 3:12 PM

#19459 RE: TMLonggun #19454

looks as if others feel differently? Stock moving up!