Replies to post #8401 on Sulja Bros. Building Supplies, Ltd (SLJB)

[pennyjunkie]

stockmover
http://www.salon.com/tech/feature/1999/05/05/stock_hoax/
Janice Shell, an art historian who resides in Milan and lives on the Silicon Investor threads, has paid her dues with incompetent brokers, painful margin squeezes and taking pills on speculative stocks. She's quite happy, now, to point out to others the error of their ways.

[rrufff]

I'm trying not to make this about her, either pro or con, and, to the extent I made it seem like that, I apologize. I'd urge all to judge for yourselves, read the PR's, read commentary and realize that all cases are not alike and that this one, so far, seems a bit different from what happened say in 1999.

My posts, hers and others, are merely opinions and should be secondary to your own DD. All PR's are not lies. All CEO's do not lie. All posters do not lie and all posters should not be believed irrespective of the particular facts of a case.

All claims of naked shorting do not result in escalating share prices. We are not talking about naked shorting here. We are talking about a situation where MM's have not closed their open shorts for an unreasonable period. That's my opinion. The bottom line is that the sharp rise supports what the company is saying and the company is saying that this will continue.

Plus, it's not just a squeeeze play, it's an asset play, with asset based financing, implying minimal dilution as is typically the case in pinkies.