InvestorsHub Logo

woody55

03/10/06 8:18 PM

#997 RE: janice shell #995

LFWK....DID THEY EXPOSE WHO SHORTED THEM? No, but their PPS SHOT UP. Be honest, that's all us investors care about.

Mr. Bill

03/10/06 11:08 PM

#1004 RE: janice shell #995

Pearce - after conducting a thorough internal investigation it was determined 1 of at most 11 insiders had been busy selling 1 share 138,000 times while soliciting help from the SEC so they could keep the proceeds. This super secret INTERNAL investigation was never shared with the MAJORITY shareholders.

So Janice, here is a question for you.

As legitimate shareholders in GVRP / MAMG can shareholders procedurally cause GVRP to publically reveal the results of their research. We are shareholders and if an insider is selling shares they do not legally have are we not entitled to be informed as to who it was?

If so, how would one go about this and could you assist with getting the ball rolling ?

StockSniper00

03/10/06 11:23 PM

#1007 RE: janice shell #995

"Speaking of them.... I looked again at the dividend notice. Pearl talks about the divvy as if it's stock in a company that trades publicly. But the Nasdaq doesn't seem to think it is; there's no ticker, just an indication that it's a Wyoming company."

Thats because the NASD sets the symbol. We wont know what it is until the xdate!




" 'The point is that different CEO's have their own way with exposing Naked Shorts.....'

Please name one who's ever succeeded in doing so."

Overstock.com CEO is currently launching a massive fight to try and expose the naked shorts.

You want documentation of MMs owning more than the float?? THIS IS THE PINKS!! How are you going to get MMs to file correctly if the companies rarely do it themselves.

SEC doesn't care about OTC stocks unless they recieve an outrageous amount of complaints, then there is an investigation. They simply dont have the manpower to police every stock. They have thousands of stocks on the big boards to deal with.