I completely disagree. I think the CEO of a public company like NNVC has a responsibility to his shareholders -- and the law -- to not be so afraid of the contents of his emails that he has to actually approve posts.
NNVC shareholders pay for Dr. S's extraordinary lavish style despite 9 years of dismal failure. They don't owe him shit.
Do you have any thoughts on why the CEO of NNVC is specifically approving POSTS on IHUB? I'm not referring to the nonsensical straw man about sharing emails in general. I'm referring specifically to the concept of Dr. S approving things to be actually posted on IHUB, not just saying what can be shared with others.
You know exactly what I was referring to. It's laughable to talk ethics within the context of this company and its slimy behavior.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
