Not convinced yet...
The argument seems to be that "... medical users are entitled to reasonable access" I'm not sure what could be more reasonable than dozens of large producers competing to provide exactly what the patient/consumer wants?
The sidebar also notes that the the marijuana community was incensed that the last regulation change only allowed a grower to provide for two customers... This suggests that the objective of having growers who will grow for more than one person, is also well met by introducing large scale regulated commercial grow-ops.
I'm not sure how one can argue that there isn't reasonable access... it should increase the availability of your medicine.
I appreciate change is hard, but maybe that's progress... used to be people raised their own chickens and cows, grew their own vegetables and made their own clothes too.... the industrial revolution comes to Marijuana production!
I know you think you should be able to grow your own narcotics - but, frankly, I'd rather they were regulated... and, yes, taxed.