Replies to post #42499 on Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[Crow3]

"Would anyone who is a Cdex direct investor not know if G4's were not paced?"

Better stated; If G4s were not placed would a CDEX direct investor know that? If so, why would he argue that they were placed? Could he be trying to deceive? Or is the writer actually a direct investor, whatever that means?? And merely indulging in the most likely futile hope that the CEO did not lie if and when he stated that the G4s were placed?

Since the CEO is a obvious habitual liar, why would the writer feel any hope that he is NOT lying this ONE time?

DAMNFINO.

[pennstreet]

CCT

Hum, the CCT was returned along with a $30,000 dollar check.

Well, lets think about this, this product was returned as this board is saying because it "DOES NOT WORK", LOL lol

So the hospital calls up Cdex and says, can return this CCT and pay you another $30,000 to boot, because it don't work.

But here is $30,000 dollars for this non-working product,

Really?

Now that is funny as heck.

[Amanita]

CDEX INC products returned

When a hospital returns a CCT because it is ineffective they wouldn't get conned into buying another model. LOL

A hospital returns a CCT to cdex and the insider claims it's a victory for cdex and its products. What a load! The CCT was returned for a reason.


A: It don't work. That might well be the case. However the hospital probably had a service contract. Ok, so, let's just think about who was servicing these CCT's before the bumfiled caused cdex bankruptcy. A team of people who actually built it and not some bankruptcy king and his can't get a job without daddy's help Kid. So, it is not far fetched to believe that the current cdex is no where near capable of servicing this device.

B: It doesn't do what they said it would do. I leave this one for the former employees to answer. The CCT was discontinued for a reason. If it was still viable cdex would still be manufacturing and selling the only product that they were able to sell or lease in numbers greater than bumfield's IQ. Of course that was due to Malcolm Philips and his teams of doctors , chemists, engineers and technical experts, now all gone.

C: It's getting no use cause the process wastes time and product, the step is redundant in the professional pharmacy process. Highly likely. Which may be the reason we see no rush by hospitals and compounding pharmacies to even consider the prop g4.

At least the parts from the dumped CCT will be sold else where to pay for a lunch or two for the entire work force of five at cdex.