Replies to post #62388 on Energy Edge Technologies Corp. (fka EEDG)

[finishsuper]

I'm not trying to Monday morning QB anyone or anything, just trying to take the available information, piece it together and decide what to do with my investment.

Been doing this for awhile and have learned a lot of lessons "the hard way". Took me quite a bit, to get thru my thick skull, that 99% of these penny plays are nothing more than funding of someone else's hobby. When the hobby proves to be unprofitable, the CEO has learned that he can continue his personal funding via cranking up the printing press.

For the record, I jumped in here hard when Holdsworth was running the energy side (I had another play that was kind of a "co-op" play). Didn't understand the entire shift in the chicken wing thing, but having been a VP of Operations in the food processing industry, I could see right away that things were not being handled as per regulations or industry standard. (Of course, on a public board, who cares about my opinion?) As the energy side went away, so did most of my investment.

Boyd interested me though, with his background and I thought maybe the few shares I had left would be worth leaving in the play.

Second guessing it now. Going public means "being public". You can't sit in a dark room and lock the door and expect everyone to just be happy, especially when your SP is sliding. If a CEO makes himself available, I am quick to contact them and stay in touch. When they start making comments about being "criticized" or "second guessed", I'm done dealing with them. My shares give me ownership in a company. My ownership entitles me to my criticism and second guessing, so long as it is respectful in nature (Check around, I don't disrespect a CEO that doesn't disrespect me.)

I attempted 3x to contact management here and never rec'd a reply back. So, now I do my DD with available information, and I share it with whoever cares. If no one cares to read my posts, so be it. Not trying to manipulate the price or destroy the play. Just trying to keep the information valid and current, so investors, new and old, can make clear decisions with their hard earned money.

Anyway, sorry for the ramble. Not interested in beating a dead horse here, just trying to figure out what is the future, and based upon that, what to do with what I have left here.

Best all. Keep digging and invest according to what you know, not what you think you know.

[finishsuper]

Last post, and I promise not to bother you guys any more:

Here is the email that I rec'd from OTC Markets inquiring about the 30 day test of .01. The company that I was asking about had their FYE of December 31, just as here, and they underwent a R/S, for the sole announced purpose (according to CEO) of "hitting the penny benchmark" to remain on the QB. CEO also stated that by doing the R/S he was "good on the QB for a whole year". Thus my detailed inquiry.

Here is the response: (I rec'd 2, each from a different person at OTC Markets):

Thanks for the question. I know that there is still some confusion on this issue. You’re correct, the company needs to achieve a .01 closing bid price once every 30 days even after the May 1st, 2014 roll-out period begins to remain on OTCQB. If this company, for example, enacted a reverse split and their closing bid price for today was the only time it was above the .01 mark, they would remain on OTCQB until May 5th. Each company essentially needs to refresh their bid price eligibility once every 30 days. I hope that makes sense. We will be publishing our rules on OTCQB eligibility shortly, and I am happy to email you a copy as soon as they are available.



Please let me know if you have any other questions.



Sincerely,



Gareth Colglazier

Issuer & Information Services



Description: Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.jpg@01CBB1A7.1048C390

100 M Street SE, Suite 220
Washington, DC 20003-3506

T [phone]

[e-mail]

Follow up questions by myself and others confirmed the exact scenario and further details.

Wishing you the best. Thanks for the replies.