You act as if it's a brand new process jump, when really it's just AMD's old 90nm process with some scotch tape on it. And if it does enable 3.0GHz, that's still about 400MHz short of what could make a difference to Conroe.
I don't believe it, you're quoting both Thomas and Ross in the same article, both of whom have been shown to be wrong? The article lives in the past talking about what AMD did. The future is that Intel now has the lead and will for 1.5 years as per Eden's comments. You will be a hurting little puppy in about 3 quarters from now. I know what happens to your type. You'll just "disappear" about that time.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
