InvestorsHub Logo

gitreal

04/19/14 11:56 PM

#62726 RE: 1manband #62718

I had a feeling that Parkinson threw that 0.055 oz/ton average number into his "report" just so someone could apply that number in the way it is being applied here. Parkinson (and GNCP) will carefully avoid an actual in-ground valuation, but they won't mind if someone else does that kind of math.

As you know, an average assay for 112 grab samples is a completely meaningless number, as grab samples are collected in a subjective manner. Not to mention that Parkinson failed to GPS any of the individual samples, or to describe what each sample represents. He's an embarrassment........