InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Traderfan

04/17/14 4:55 PM

#63277 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

Great posting IMO. Unfortunately the truth so far.
icon url

emptyone

04/17/14 5:50 PM

#63280 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

good points TF and I also hope you are on the call ....
icon url

stolpen

04/17/14 8:20 PM

#63284 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

Couldn´t have said it better, hammer on the nail.
icon url

NewJerichoMan

04/17/14 9:22 PM

#63289 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

Nice post but I think you hold the Naz in too high of regard. They've let plenty of Mickey Mouse-run companies on board in the past.

Given we're basically a reverse-merger Chinese company is a big strike.

PS - you need a new moniker. There can be only one TF.
icon url

snow

04/18/14 2:36 AM

#63296 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

Trip

I think you have a very good point. In practice this seems to be a one-man-show when it comes to the important decisions. The independent Board members do not give the impression of being independent in practice. Solomon only owns about 10 % of the Company. We need members on the Board who truly represent the majority of the shareholders.
icon url

snow

04/18/14 2:40 AM

#63297 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

Trip

I have taken the liberty to e-mail your post to Peter and asked him to send it to Solomon. I don't know if he will do that.
icon url

emptyone

04/18/14 10:07 AM

#63322 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

TF, with reflection, I can't believe that Solomon could be so stubborn as not to separate himself from the CFO role and the other factors you mention if it would means a Nasdaq listing. My guess is that they are having trouble explaining the complex nature of the company with all the JVs and also the continual dilution.
icon url

The Swede

04/20/14 6:16 AM

#63367 RE: Trip-Fontaine #63275

If Solomon cancels his golden shares, he will have to raise the AS again to protect the company from a hostile takeover. Dont think the market would appreciate that either.