When I look at a company that has purchased another company with stock instead of a loan or financial backer i know the stock goes down, but the debt of the company usually isn't effected. It's a give and take situation. What would be better for the company? Being in debt or purchasing with stock. Personally I wish he would have gone in debt a little and not diluted. Be that as it may, do the companies that are purchased gonna add value? Are they going to do anything positive for the company? I know people like to think using stocks to purchase is bad, but it's not. Of course, it's not a good thing either. But the bigger picture shouldn't be using the stocks to purchase, but what got purchased. I realize this is a penny stock and flippers are everywhere, me included, but sometimes you just need to hold for the long haul.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
