InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

salgovernale69

04/11/14 4:16 PM

#10993 RE: besportie #10992

Anyone who is investing based on conversations amongst longs on a message board should have their head examined. Your pleading to folks on here to tone it down as if they owe something to investors who might be mislead is asinine and comical.

As for your opinion of the partnership, all you have to do is listen to the 30 minute presentation given by the CEO on Tuesday in which he used the word partnership about 27 times and do some connecting of the dots that a 5 year old would be capable of and you'd see it pretty clearly.
icon url

gemmill

04/11/14 4:21 PM

#10994 RE: besportie #10992

I really appreciate all your posts as well! care to be more specific as to what's unrealistic about what has been mentioned recently? If you think something is unrealistic, I would like to hear what part of what statement you deem to be unrealistic. Thanks. $ONCS
icon url

mackwheaton

04/11/14 4:30 PM

#10995 RE: besportie #10992

Besportie, you said "Just stay realistic in order not to mislead new people to get in the stock at these levels" What? Given the company has results for 3 separate Phase II studies coming, at what levels should we be optimistic and hence, leading new people to buy?

I added 80,000 shares today, each day we draw closer to results that are not dependent on drugs but on their delivery into a tumor site. This is the FDA equivalent of shooting fish in a barrel. If one of the 3 are successful we double our money.

New people need to do what we did, research, learn and buy when you are comfortable. Each penny down today was one cent less risk I undertook to invest, as there was no news to create such a drop, only fear.
icon url

123tom

04/14/14 2:47 PM

#11108 RE: besportie #10992

@ Besportie, excellent call,last Friday....
not sure how many of the good folks here listened to your warning.
but thank you for it, and well done.