Replies to post #42430 on Exobox Technologies Corp (EXBX)

[GoodVibrations]

You still haven't addressed the issue- How many shares of exbx will there be left over after the split? I also see the lawsuit in Nev. is a personal injury suit. Really? Don't forget to put in the lawsuit that whoever is hurting is because they tried to do the merger without shareholder votes as required by the by-laws. Do you work in the Obama Admin.? This case has no merit and will fail once the facts are known. The spin that is going out isn't vey convincing.

All in my opinion

[FunkyCoolModena]

a highly profitable construction company?

Wow I hope someone can prove that.

Wow would I love to inspect the books & records to that profitable construction company.

Wow would I love to inspect the books & records to that whole share exchange deal.

So far, from what I can determine, and in my opinion, it doesn't seem to me that the company wants to disclose or reveal a whole lot about that share exchange deal.


and would also have raised significant and much-needed funds?

Really?


while Exobox reorganized into a new publicly-traded company?

Really? Just like that ?? Guaranteed?



Just my opinion, but when a party you are suing makes a motion for summary judgment that is properly supported by declarations (or other sworn testimony), you cannot simply rely on what your
complaint says. Instead, you must set out specific facts in the form of admissible evidence (such as affidavits, declarations, depositions, answers to nterrogatories, or properly authenticated documents as provided in Rule 56(e)), that contradict the facts shown in the defendant's declarations and documents and show that there is a genuine issue of material fact for trial.







Go EXBX !!!