InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

HALF FULL GLASS

03/04/06 11:11 PM

#2385 RE: bocxman #2384

Bocxman,

I believe they did do this independent test but the expensive independent tests don't seem to get the public very excited. Until Abbott releases approval + FDA follows suite, we are in a holding pattern. Many tests have been performed with great results but it was Abbott's anouncement that moved the stock.

The presentation includes a comparison, cancer by cancer, of the data obtained by BioCurex with data obtained in a blind study by an external independent research group. In one case (benign breast tumors vs. cancer) the results from the blind test were slightly lower than ours but yet very significant, whereas in most other cases, the results obtained with the blind samples were similar or even better than our own -- such as with breast cancers vs. normal individuals, in which the RECAF blind test achieved 100% Sensitivity with 100% Specificity on the 43 cancer and 50 normal samples sent by the independent scientists.

The talk included diagnostic test results on tissue sections and blood samples, as well as preliminary results on the therapeutic applications demonstrating that RECAF technology can be used to kill 100% of cancer cells in culture without killing a significant number of normal cells.
http://72.14.207.104/search?q=cache:gyb2KOx1chcJ:biz.yahoo.com/pz/051114/89764.html+biocurex+indepen...

icon url

erthang

03/04/06 11:52 PM

#2386 RE: bocxman #2384

Boxman - I am not the self - proclaimed spokesperson for this board! You and other board members are free to call and ask him your own questions. Just don't mention our interview because I don't want him to think that I didn't keep certain aspects of our conversation confidential (which I did).
icon url

great-grandma

03/05/06 11:18 PM

#2408 RE: bocxman #2384

Bocxman,

For a long time you seemed to be the chief advocate of Biocurex on this board, and certainly you seemed to be one of the best informed. Yet lately you seem very negative. Maybe things are taking longer than we anticipated, but none of us has ever seen anything even close to disproving the technology, and that's the most important thing. We just have to hang in there. Our time will come. (Of course I have to qualify that last statement by saying: I sure hope so.)

I do have a question, though: Does anyone have any idea how long it may take for Dr. Sell to get something published? I had had high hopes when he joined the Scientific Board, but so far nothing. An article about RECAF in the right journal could do wonders.