InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 53
Posts 3489
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/05/2014

Re: $UPERMAN post# 39307

Wednesday, 04/02/2014 3:10:24 PM

Wednesday, April 02, 2014 3:10:24 PM

Post# of 66247
So, let me get this straight. We are suppose to believe that 3 years ago, PPJ received a contract from the New Jersey Pain Management Physician's Group:

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/ppj-enterprise-awarded-contract-with-new-jersey-pain-management-physicians-group-pinksheets-ppje-1500757.htm

and now, PPJ received a contract from the Houston Pain Management Physician's Group:

http://www.marketwired.com/press-release/update-ppj-enterprises-awarded-contract-with-houston-pain-management-physicians-group-pinksheets-ppje-1895310.htm

and we are suppose to believe that the only difference in the names of the two clients is that "Houston" is substituted for "New Jersey"?

Just how many businesses exist with such a convoluted name?

Of course, if Chandana Basu could have actually proofread her own press release before issuing it yesterday, we likely would not be having this conversation about "New Jersey" versus "Houston." The story, according to $UPERMAN is that Marketwired release the wrong press release. Well, where is Marketwired get a copy of the wrong press release in the first place? Out of thin air? Of course not... Marketwired got a copy of yesterday's "incorrect" press release from PPJ.

I will be confirming the actual existence, or lack of it, of BOTH the New Jersey Pain Management Physician's Group and the Houston Pain Management Physician's Group. Adverse results will be reported to the SEC, and the Attorneys General of the states of California and Nevada.