Radient Pharmaceuticals Corporation fka RXPC

[guardiangel]

So now that all the facts are out with no answer from you two, to who has bought over 4 billion shares, you two want to go back to the settlement. The 2.5 million is standard when it is difficult to prove damages. That is why Rosen and Radient settled with 2.5 million dollars..The lead plaintiff and those that filed couldn't prove more than 2.5 million...YOU HAVE TO PROVE DAMAGES..If the lead plaintiff and those that filed damages don't total more than 2.5 million dollars then Rosen and Radient would have to spend more monies to litigate, and it is possible the damages that can be proven could be less.....Really guys, have you ever studied law? another reason...If you are correct that Radient wasn't using Insurance and Rosen knew that, then they would settle for less..If there was insurance then they would have gone for more but very doubtful..Because YOU HAVE TO PROVE DAMAGES.....Similar to a doctor. They will charge you less if you pay them without insurance..They will charge you more if you have insurance..Simple logic can be used here not one sided opinions and "Here Say" you understand..Nice try guys> I hope I educated you in logic and law...You are very welcome..What do you want to talk about now that we can put your one sided assumptions to rest? Here is an example of a recent litigation I was following...This was settled out of court for 2.5 million. If there is no insurance as you claim, then someone within the takeover group or the lenders are happy to settle for 2.5 million ..It is all about Damages and they have to be proven. If the plaintiffs cannot prove more than 2.5 million then it is a waste of time in a court setting..Period One more thing? Do you really believe that retailers know about Radient to buy 4,75 million shares? How many longs are there? Only a handful..How do I know...Just read the two forums...There are no retailers..Only penny flippers, and there were never that many people posting here or there.. wonder why? lol We really do appreciate your efforts to keep newbies from buying shares. That is what you two have always posted, that you are here to look out for the newbies..We would rather have the majority of the shares in strong hands, like a creeping takeover group and the 2009 and 2011 lenders then penny flippers....Like Exlax..They claim that the hedgies own 90 percent of the float..Similar to RXPC you understand..Capiche?


Domino’s Pizza Drivers Reach $2.5 Million Tentative Settlement for Violations of Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”)
Posted on April 2, 2013 by Richard Hayber

In Singleton v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC, a case filed in Maryland, the parties recently submitted to the court a motion for preliminary approval of a proposed class action settlement in the amount of $2.5 million dollars. Plaintiffs Adrian Singleton and Justin D’Heilly sued on behalf of Domino’s employees and prospective employees. They claimed that Domino’s willfully violated the FCRA by taking adverse employment actions against employees and prospective employees without first providing them a copy of their background check reports and a reasonable opportunity to respond to any inaccuracies in the reports. The plaintiffs also claimed that the forms that Domino’s required employees to sign to give permission for the background checks did not meet the requirements of the FCRA because, among other things, the form was part of an employment application form instead of it being a “stand alone” document.

What triggered the suit was that D’Heilly had worked for Domino’s for almost a year without any incident when the store stopped scheduling him for work and subsequently fired him because “something had come up on a background check relating to his motor vehicle history”. Domino’s did not give him any more information, and never provided him with a copy of the background check report that contained the “motor vehicle history”. If those facts had been proven at trial, then they would have constituted violations of the FCRA.

We wish the attorneys At Nichols Kaster luck in getting final approval of the settlement.

http://ctemployeerightsblog.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/dominos-pizza-drivers-reach-2-5-million-tentative-settlement-for-violations-of-fair-credit-reporting-act-fcra-2/