NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[changes_iv]

There is no need to ask Dr. Seymour frivolous questions from naysayers about GLP, cGMP, cGMP-like!

The question that should be present in everyone's mind is, if GLP and cGMP are equivalent, if FluCide (or any other nanoviricide(R)) are low-toxicity and effective regardless if the path is GLP or GMP, why not allow it to take the fastest path/means to the clinical trials and save as many lives as possible? Let's show some more flexibility! Reimburse some of the costs (50% or more) incurred by NanoViricides, Inc. to bring life-saving drugs to the market. Our government has done it before for far less worthy causes.

The question(s) should be directed to:

1- The FDA

2- Your state U.S. Senator/U.S. Representative (science, technology, healthcare committees)

3- Every time you see a report/news on viruses taking human life, write to your local broadcaster and tip them about NanoViricides, Inc. life-saving therapeutic drugs

The GLPs are designed to protect scientific data integrity, and to provide EPA or FDA with a clear and auditable record of open-ended research studies. In contrast, the GMPs are intended to demonstrate to FDA whether or not individual batches of a regulated product are manufactured according to pre-defined manufacturing criteria.

source: http://www.antimicrobialtestlaboratories.com/what_is_the_difference_between_GLP_and_GMP_lab_testing_regulations.htm