InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 43
Posts 2886
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/17/2005

Re: None

Thursday, 03/02/2006 10:57:06 PM

Thursday, March 02, 2006 10:57:06 PM

Post# of 361355
Lemme try this...

lsm39_2000's post and the map I believe he was talking about:

Oh, substitute 1,2,4,5 for 1,2,3,4.

Gonna have to use a link instead.
_________________________________________________________

http://www.pgs.com/Custom/templates/DataLibrary/survey____25536.aspx

By: lsm39_2000
24 Feb 2006, 06:13 PM EST
Msg. 84091 of 84487
Jump to msg. #
Yemen -
I see the fine hand of CVX in all of this.

I vaguely recall a simplified structure map from a couple of years ago that had a northerly bounding E-W fault with contours on the south side that indicated one closure against the fault that encompassed all of blocks 1,2,3,4.

If this is the case, Chevron mis-interpreted a flat spot as the O/W contact and they are either in a high liquid gas cap, or are in a statutory gas zone, and the oil leg is in all three of the other blocks.If this is your recollection, this structure would be Gawar sized (if not Gawar shaped).

Besides the fact that, if this is the case, CVX should fire all involved for stupidity, if not incompetence, they would have proven up a field that would double their (Corporate)reserve base all around them (but not belonging TO them).

Is this the map that you are talking about in this morning's post or am I hallucinating?

At any rate, if this is so, Chevron would be willing to do anything to get back into the field.

Help an old man's memory -TIA and

Cheers,
Larry




A wise man never plays leap-frog with a unicorn.