InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 718
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/08/2009

Re: dcspka post# 20302

Friday, 03/28/2014 11:24:04 AM

Friday, March 28, 2014 11:24:04 AM

Post# of 30046
Whether they resurrect the company or not, they must pay that settlement. Even if they file for bankruptcy, they must STILL pay that settlement.

Assuming they have the money or have insurance to pay it.

And Radient is not going to get licensing fees for DR-70 after June 3rd, 2014, because their patent expires on that day. So I am not suggesting that Radient is going to "try to ONLY get minimal licensing fees" -- I am suggesting that Radient is not going to do anything at all. No PR's, no leasign a building, no operating a company.

By the way -- you think $2.5 is "rather large?" Odd, I have been hearing from the other Longs that $2.5M is not large at all and a victory for Radient. You disagree?


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.