InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 778
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/18/2003

Re: Tenchu post# 25406

Thursday, 03/02/2006 1:04:51 PM

Thursday, March 02, 2006 1:04:51 PM

Post# of 151689
Tenchu,

The key sentence in your quote is actually this, .."If it is, the public needs to know that."

Can it be made any more clearer, by AMD's own lawyers no less, that this lawsuit is nothing more than a high profile, high risk, PR stunt. Of course, as any diehard AMD fan will tell you, there is the hope that AMD will actually find a "smoking gun" somewhere. I doubt they have, given Intel's recognition of its own status in the eyes of the FTC and other government agencies. If AMD had found anything of significance, they would not need to issue subpoena's to Skype and others, almost a year after the accusations. AMD is desperate to find something, and it almost seems as if Intel did this on purpose. Is Intel trying to bate AMD or something? Why would Intel risk this if they knew, given AMD's crying, the subpoena's would follow?

IMHO
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News