InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 275
Posts 32167
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 02/14/2014

Re: MonestHind post# 14855

Thursday, 03/27/2014 5:20:47 PM

Thursday, March 27, 2014 5:20:47 PM

Post# of 111920
Per the merger agreement the split was not necessary. It is pointed out to notify everyone that the 750M shares issues as part of the merger would be post split shares.

No where in the agreement does it say that the merger is contingent on the reverse split. Just that the shares issues would not be subject to the 30-1 split.