InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 4
Posts 116
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/28/2012

Re: PeterGates post# 22496

Thursday, 03/27/2014 11:37:20 AM

Thursday, March 27, 2014 11:37:20 AM

Post# of 68548
PeterGates: I am not at all surprised by your response to my post, below.

If you think 99% OTC are scam then to think ECOS falls under remaining 1%, you are making a fool out of yourself. MS is making fool out of investors. Just wait for another story to get out for good.



I never said that I think 99% of OTC (or sub-pennies) are scams. What I thought I was clear about, was that 99% of sub-pennies don't make the big time. Sure, many are scams, but posters like you either a) don't know the difference between a scam, and a failure to execute, and/or b) don't want to know or care to know the difference, as that knowledge doesn't fit with your investment strategy. You have a clear agenda that is based upon you making money by bashing a stock. If and when good news comes out, you likely switch ID's and try to pump the same stock. If the stock tanks, like most pennies do, then you thump your chest a bit and declare "see I was right". This is in no way criticism, but just a statement (again) to say that your kind pretty much dominate the penny stock boards. Someone like lambchops posts something sensible, and you or others call them (or me) a fool.

Guys like me, pretty much abandon the boards long ago, because of people you. Sure, I read to see if anyone caught something of value they are sharing, but like the mostly failing stocks in the pennies, my take is that posters like you will dominate a board, and provide no real value.

If you'd like to prove me wrong, please do. Surely, you have some semblance of proof to your statements that this is a scan. Can you, or any others who have called MS a crook, this a scam, or said that investors should call the SEC, have a single proof point to back up your statement? Missing deadlines, not answering a call or email, misspellings, providing forward looking statements, lack of PR, etc., etc, are not proof of a scam, character, or violations.

I won't pretend to know your motivation, but is is clear to me what your intentions are regarding this stock. I also never said that I THOUGHT ECOS was in the 1%. I don't buy pennies and assume I am that smart. What I said, was that all pennies are a gamble. Of course, I hope I am lucky, but no more than buying a lottery ticket or playing poker. I don't gamble THINKING I am going to win, I gamble HOPING I will be lucky. It is usually better to be lucky, than good.

If you are pretending to be holding a long position on this stock, for anything more than a quick flip, then you are foolish to believe many / most or all other posters don't see through that pretense. Else, you'd be foolish for holding a long position, for a long haul, while bashing the stock. As mentioned, maybe you are trying trying to get 0.0001 filled to flip at 0.0002 when news come out. I won't pretend to know your intentions, but if you don't think that others know what you are up to, then you are the fool.

GLTA - HB

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.