InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 1080
Posts 106243
Boards Moderated 55
Alias Born 11/22/2003

Re: NYBob post# 683

Wednesday, 03/26/2014 6:20:06 PM

Wednesday, March 26, 2014 6:20:06 PM

Post# of 864
Kemess gold-copper mine proposal on table again


WENDY STUECK
VANCOUVER — The Globe and Mail
Published Sunday, Mar. 09 2014, 10:32 PM EDT
Last updated Monday, Mar. 10 2014, 1:16 PM EDT

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/british-columbia/kemess-mine-back-with-underground-plan/article17391189/

A mine rejected in 2008 on environmental grounds is back in play,
with a different company at the helm and
plans for an underground,

rather than an open-pit, operation.

Toronto-based AuRico Gold





filed a project description for
the Kemess Underground Mine Project
with the B.C. Environmental Assessment Office last month,
reviving plans for a gold-copper deposit about 250 kilometres
north of Smithers and about 6.5 kilometres north of former
producer Kemess South Mine, which was in production from 1988 to
2011.


In the years leading up to Kemess South being depleted,
former owner Northgate Minerals made plans to extend operations
by developing the nearby Kemess North deposit.
Plans at the time called for disposing of tailings and waste rock
from expanded operations in Duncan Lake, also known as Amazay
Lake.

That plan did not sit well with aboriginal groups that had
historic and cultural connections to the lake.

In 2007, a federal review panel concluded Kemess North as it was
then designed was not in the public interest “because of
significant adverse environmental, social and cultural effects,
some of which may not emerge until many years after mining
operations cease.”

After reviewing the panel decision, Ottawa in March, 2008,
said the project should not go ahead.

That was a major setback for Northgate,
which was acquired by AuRico Gold in a friendly,
$1.5-billion deal in 2011.

Even before that deal closed, attempts were under way to find
a way to put Kemess North back on the table – which meant
giving up the notion of using Duncan Lake as a tailings site.

“It was obvious that to get social licence [for the project],
we had to do a far better job of explaining and
engaging with First Nations,” said Chris Rockingham,
who was formerly with Northgate and is now vice-president
of business development with AuRico.
“To get a discussion going, we made a commitment that we would
not consider using Amazay Lake for any purpose related to
mining.”


The current proposal calls for tailings to be disposed of
in the old open pit.

AuRico has also been able to develop its feasibility plan
based on copper and gold prices that are significantly
higher than they were when Northgate was pursuing the project.


AuRico and Tse Keh Nay – an alliance representing the Takla Lake,
Tsay Keh Dene and Kwadacha aboriginal groups –
reached an “interim measures” agreement in 2012
that set the stage for the project
to move into environmental review.


AuRico has other producing mines
so is not under pressure to bring
Kemess Underground into production,
Mr. Rockingham said.

The $500-million Kemess Underground project
must undergo a provincial review, and a federal review
may also be required.


Under rules introduced in 2012, B.C. has applied to substitute
its process for a federal review if one is required.
The deadline for public comments on that request is March 13.


It is not unusual for a mine proponent that fails to obtain a
permit to take another try.

Vancouver-based Taseko Mines redesigned its New Prosperity copper-
gold mine project after the federal government turned down an
earlier proposal – known as Prosperity – in 2010.
Ottawa rejected the $1-billion project a second time in February.

Taseko is pursuing a judicial review of what it maintains was
a flawed federal panel review.

Designs can be reconfigured based on factors including commodity
prices, technology, environmental issues or a change
in corporate ownership.

Environmental laws do not prohibit multiple applications, but
permits are typically granted with a limited time window in which
proponents have to develop the project or start
the process over again.

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=97506028



http://www.auricogold.com/Home/default.aspx
God Bless


My opinions are my own and and DD I post should be confirmed as unbiased

Recent AMI News