![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Sunday, March 23, 2014 7:41:01 PM
Since the contention for Fairholme and Perry is the 3rd amendment a negotiated resolution may involve pre/post Aug 17, 2012 purchases. I also suspect that if the 3rd amendment is vacated by the judge, this ruling will affect the entire class of equity regardless of when purchases happened. So the judge could potentially make everyone whole whereas a negotiated agreement might not.
But as 44c always says, I am not a lawyer so this is a layman's opinion and is worth no more no less than anyone else's opinion.
Recent FNMAS News
- Form 3 - Initial statement of beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2024 08:07:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/14/2024 08:05:24 PM
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM