Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:54:11 PM
The only possibility is that JBI is using the current Cost of Unit2 #2 and #3 as a sale price. That is entirely unrealistic. It is like someone (and we have all met people like this) trying to sell a car after having restored it and wanting all of the money he spent back out of it. It is entirely unrealistic.
Here is the P&E line from the last financial statements:
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET (Note 5) 8,618,865
Sounds an awful lot like 8 or 9 Million, doesn't it? That is the only logical reason I can see. Complete naivete on the part of JBI.
Avant Technologies Engages Wired4Tech to Evaluate the Performance of Next Generation AI Server Technology • AVAI • May 23, 2024 8:00 AM
Branded Legacy, Inc. Unveils Collaboration with Celebrity Tattoo Artist Kat Tat for New Tattoo Aftercare Product • BLEG • May 22, 2024 8:30 AM
"Defo's Morning Briefing" Set to Debut for "GreenliteTV" • GRNL • May 21, 2024 2:28 PM
North Bay Resources Announces 50/50 JV at Fran Gold Project, British Columbia; Initiates NI 43-101 Resources Estimate and Bulk Sample • NBRI • May 21, 2024 9:07 AM
Greenlite Ventures Inks Deal to Acquire No Limit Technology • GRNL • May 17, 2024 3:00 PM
Music Licensing, Inc. (OTC: SONG) Subsidiary Pro Music Rights Secures Final Judgment of $114,081.30 USD, Demonstrating Strength of Licensing Agreements • SONGD • May 17, 2024 11:00 AM