InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 17023
Next 10
Followers 4
Posts 555
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/15/2004

Re: smd1234 post# 8449

Monday, 02/27/2006 2:49:29 AM

Monday, February 27, 2006 2:49:29 AM

Post# of 17023
This post contains my views:

by: smdgc 02/27/06 02:11 am
Msg: 910637 of 910638

The docs were indeed rec'd from MU and Hynix.
They had submitted those docs to DOJ and Kramer made them provide copies to Rambus.

That was never my issue.

As part of the process of providing those docs to Rambus, the 3 parties (RMBS, MU and Hynix) negotiated the terms of a protective order - which Kramer then entered.

MU and Hynix subsequently refused to modify the protective order to accommodate RMBS's request to provide a PORTION - approximating 250 pages - to the FTC.

Upon that refusal, RMBS asked Kramer - as the Judge who had entered the order - to modify the protective order so that the FTC submittal could be accomplished. That RMBS request to Kramer has been pending since October 2005.

My difficulty w/o being able to see the court minutes from 2/23 is understanding how the protective order was modified or lifted - when all accounts indicate that Kramer DID NOT modify or lift it.

Hopefully this will be clarified, but for right now I remain skeptical about RMBS's ability to make the FTC submittal as desired.

smd

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RMBS News