InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 2837
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/23/2009

Re: postyle post# 16586

Saturday, 03/15/2014 9:46:19 AM

Saturday, March 15, 2014 9:46:19 AM

Post# of 46514
I do not have a crystal ball either but seen enough intellectual property suits to at least base an opinion on. I understand the ruling but believe it was flawed. The judge also ruled that the suit can move forward BUT only with priority of infringement to the date when the admin error from USPTO was corrected. Worlds can easily file a new suit with all the correct documents and claim priority to the provisional application. Common sense and provided documents does indeed show the link to the provisional even though the USPTO did omit to put this in the first sentence when issuing the patent. Further new continuance in part applications have indeed also referred back to the provisional.

imho nothing has changed as far as how I view the strength of the Worlds patents. Now the parties will file new briefs and also go to settlement talks so lets see what happens. It is indeed sad how large corporations steal and crush the small innovative companies but hopefully justice will prevail.