InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 27
Posts 2837
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 12/23/2009

Re: None

Thursday, 03/13/2014 10:27:48 AM

Thursday, March 13, 2014 10:27:48 AM

Post# of 46497
" the Court declines to enter judgment in Defendants’ favor at this time. Instead, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer to discuss whether the appropriate course of action is for the Court to dismiss the instant action (without preventing Worlds from commencing a new action alleging infringement from the date of the certificates going forward), or merely confine this decision to infringement allegedly occurring from the dates the patents issued through the lives of the Patents-In-Suit."

i.e. no judgement for Activision. This will either get settled or continued with probably the addition of a new suit. The prior art argument is bogus as it was an error on the part of the USPTO but the ruling follows the law.

The people that only read the headline run for the hills, read the whole ruling and nothing materially has changed imho
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent WDDD News