I do not for one second believe that Ron would not have taken a board position if asked within a reasonable time frame. He would in fact have taken a board position [EOM]
When I spoke with Paul about "positions regarding board status", I mentioned the fact that most boards are diverse; meaning that quite possibly someone from the Oil industry would be a great pick. Paul's comments were [and not verbatim] he's not thinking this way.
So, what are we to think given all the facts which have presented itself regarding Pauls demeanor overall?
Ron owns 20-some million shares; Paul owns 50-some million. Do you think that Paul would for one second has someone on the board, which if in the future, and with other shareholders, have the ability to out gun him? I think not!
I have yet to ask anything of Ron, I mean anything to have him blow up or say something off color. Does that suggest someone of management caliber? Absolutely! Is that Paul's philosophy? Hasn’t been from the get go!
Ron is a great guy from every possible perspective, and shouldn’t that also be the case for Paul Alonzo? I would be willing to bet that since this is a pink-sheet, those who have left, lost faith in Paul and not in the company.
Most of my comments have been centered on the inability of Paul Alonzo to run a public company from the ground up. It has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with his experience, training or education. Do you understand that?
I doubt if Paul does, because once I got off the phone with Paul during our fiasco regarding “paranoia of competition finding out”, he told Ron no doubt some horrible things. Why do I say that? Because of the way Ron changed his conversational nature with me regarding what Paul said. And you can take it to the bank that I said nothing mean spirited, bad language or anything off color during that conversation.
So, if we get info regarding a prolonged 10k form, and nothing upfront to keep the PPS at acceptable level, we all know who to blame. It burns me that we have product leaving the station heading to the levee’s, but Paul’s paranoia for whatever reason, doesn’t see fit to give all the information ‘transparency’ for the betterment of shareholders.
I commend you for taking your case to Paul, as a rebuttal to Paul is not needed. Trust me, I’m not mad at the guy one bit, but he is not fit to run a PUBLIC ENTITY.
We are a fly in his ointment!
Regards,
Stephen
ps... you or others may ask; why not take this to Paul personally? I'm sure many here already the answer... so be it!
