The fact that a CEO has shares is a normal thing. Nothing "great" about that.
The fact that the LEXG CEO has given himself 20 million more shares is a questionable thing. Why do this when you make no money for the company, and you are diluting all of the holdings of the shareholders?
The fact that LEXG has no revenue, but tries to tie their name to TESLA (a company with plans to use lithium batteries), but they have zero connection to LEXG is a suspect thing. Especially as it comes after the LEXG CEO has issued himself those 20 million shares.
Connect those dots people. LEXG is trying to take you for another ride, and it is not going to be in a TESLA lolol.
"Despise the enemy strategically, but take him seriously tactically."
Mao Tse-Tung
