InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 23
Posts 1676
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/27/2013

Re: obiterdictum post# 182237

Monday, 03/03/2014 1:29:35 AM

Monday, March 03, 2014 1:29:35 AM

Post# of 798680
What does this statement mean exactly?

In response to the defendant’s claim that the FHFA is not the “United States” for the purposes of the Tucker Act, Judge Sweeney noted that answering this question would require a “fact-intense inquiry that will include consideration of whether the FHFA acted at the direct behest of the Treasury.” Judge Sweeney further notes that if FHFA was an agent and arm of the Treasury, then the U.S. Court of Federal Claims would possess jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ complaint.


and this one

Briefing on defendant’s dispositive motion is stayed pending the conclusion of fact discovery


?
http://www.restorefanniemae.us/calendar