ScripsAmerica Inc. (SCRCQ)

[coolerheadsprevail]

Alleyba says...............

...........in my opinion your putting a post about Joeseph Zampetti when you google his name was improper and not the right thing to do. To publically do that when you google his name is criminal in my opinion. While I tolerate your posts you never definitively state whether you own SCRC or not. In my mind, if you own the stock why would you post negative comments? Therefore, I can only conclude because you post with such regularity you are as worse as IHUB and Iron Ridge and that my friend puts you, in my opinion, in the same class that you classify Joseph Zampetti. Can you tell me how I may have made a mistake with those comments?

Gladly.

(1)
I have posted on many occasions that I am long SCRC and have been since last summer, when most SCRC investors jumped on board what we thought was a legitimate rocket ship launching. I have also posted many times about the fact that I traded around my core position, as I and many others regularly do w/penny spec stocks, in order to de-risk, and that I now am patiently waiting on my pile of long commons that I am free-rolling w/what is essentially house money.

(2)
If you pay close attention to my posts and actually read them at face value –- which means making a good faith genuine effort to take the confirmation bias that often plagues “longs” of virtually every stock out of the equation –- you will see that I have rarely said negative things about SCRC. I have posted many times about my belief that SCRC can achieve its goals (but that I disagree w/the Core promoters as to the magnitude of any immediate short-term gains). The only criticisms I have had w/SCRC has been with what I staunchly believe to be CEO Bob’s boneheaded decision to engage the services of a P&D crew.

Aside from that, the vast majority of what you may consider to be “negative” posts have been legitimate commentary in pointing out to the many others who visit this board that there exists a criminal element roaming freely pretending to be regular retail joes. And, yes, they are criminal. Are you familiar with what Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933 is? If not, I suggest you look it up; if so, there is irrefutable evidence (which unfortunately cannot be posted due to iHub TOS policies) that JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and many members of the “inner” Core are in violation of this law. Do you see any of the required disclosures in their profiles and posts? I sure don’t. Are you suggesting that those who violate laws are not criminals?

(3)
It is the height of hypocrisy for JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his “inner core” who have violated the law and profited by misleading many innocent investors into losing significant sums of money to cry about what he/they deem to be “right”. I don’t control what Google retrieves when search criteria are entered. iHub is public, so there is no issue with anything showing up inappropriately in a Google search anyways. And I seriously doubt that those who fell victim to JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and his “inner” core’s deceptions have much, if any, sympathy whatsoever for JZ.

All I have asked previously – and which I ask again – is for JOSEPH ZAMPETTI and the other members of his “inner” core who received shares of restricted stock as compensation for promoting the company last summer to immediately disclose themselves properly in accordance with the requirements of Section 17(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. This way, they can continue promoting away and serve as much kool-aid as they want, because at least then, unsuspecting visitors who either read their uber-bullish posts or receive personal solicitations from them to buy into SCRC can see that there is a potential conflict of interest. At that time, because the disclosure is there, these potential investors can then decide for themselves whether to believe the Core or not – and if they do, then whatever happens is truly all on them at that point. A true “caveat emptor” scenario, the way investing should be.

And once they do this, I will be more than happy to regularly post for all to see a series of reminders and accolades of how stand-up JZ and his gang are for stepping up and doing the right thing and complying with securities laws even though it was hard for them to do so at this juncture – and these posts will also show up in any future Google searches as well. Demanding and expecting full disclosure as required by the SEC is the foundation that enables us to have faith in the market, be it from the companies we seek to invest in or otherwise.

I hope this helps clarify my perspective on this matter. I welcome dialogue on this subject so please feel free to continue to ask whatever questions you may have…

…but it’s Friday and it’s time to go enjoy Friday nite festivities, so I look forward to further dialogue w/you next week, Alleyba…