Advanced Micro Devices Inc (AMD)

[bababouie]

wbmw, like I said, QS is not perfect. I am not sure what your beef is especially since you agree that a perfect measurement is not likely to appear. What did you want AMD to do? Concede the market to Intel because their Mhz wasn't as high as Intel's? They did the best they could and it turned out ok. As far as the consumer goes, buying based on QS is not that bad. You'll get a fairer approximation of system performance that way than thinking than the moving target of Intel Mhz. Mhz in the intel world means nothing because the P3, P3 celeron, P4, P4 celeron, all perform differently at the same Mhz. I think it's time for this thread to die :)


C