InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 1520
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/09/2005

Re: success622 post# 58923

Saturday, 02/18/2006 9:40:49 AM

Saturday, February 18, 2006 9:40:49 AM

Post# of 326388
Success..dont say my interpretation of something is WRONG because you disagree with it. To imply that your interpretation is RIGHT when I posted the language here from the SEC website as to what a company can release and what they cant release, under the changes that took effect on 1 December 2005.

So if you dont agree with that language, it dont make your interpretation any more right then mine, especially when the regs say a company can report any news in the same manner as they have before the offering, as long as it dont address the offering thats pending.

So rather then tell someone their interpretation is wrong, it would be better to disagree on the interpretations, instead of claiming yours is right.

The only issue on that particular change is whether that reg, defines a penny stock different then another reg that the Sec has in place. But the info in that document whether it pertains to NEOM or not, gives companies it does pertain to, the right to disclose any material or forwarding looking statements, that have nothing to do with the offering pending. That part is not debatable and in black and white on the SEC web site. The only thing debatable is whether it pertains to NEOM as a penny stock, or NEOM as a reporting company.