InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 177
Posts 17279
Boards Moderated 2
Alias Born 07/07/2002

Re: pleeb01 post# 53842

Sunday, 02/23/2014 7:03:50 PM

Sunday, February 23, 2014 7:03:50 PM

Post# of 53986
Well, yes and no.

The company has sold billions of shares to Ihubbers. All of them would want to be paid for the shares they would tender. Leaving them in possession would be extremely dilutive.

And, we all know that a reverse split will reduce that dilution. But why go through the time and expense and legal battles when a shell broker can find you a clean shell without those pesky problems for around $100K and you would be in it in less than 60 days.

This is just 1 broker of many and he has hundreds of shell listings...http://www.mergernetwork.com/public-shell-companies-for-sale/page-1

The buying of INBG as a shell is just not cost effective for anyone who would hire a lawyer to give him advice. (Read that every potential buyer) Selling this shell was 3 of the scams already played out by the CEO of this pig. Never was successful. Just made him a couple more million$ on the sale of shares to Ihubbers.

Reverse merger won't work for those same reasons.


For help and ideas for building or fixing your computer, visit the Ihub Dream Machine board.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=2128

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.