InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 21
Posts 1757
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2013

Re: Nome44 post# 4907

Friday, 02/21/2014 1:20:37 PM

Friday, February 21, 2014 1:20:37 PM

Post# of 63559
"...more than 1,600 reverse splits done from 1962 through 2001. They found that, after the first year, the split shares underperformed comparable unsplit stocks by 15.6%, on average. After two years, the cumulative underperformance was 36%; after three, 54%. And stocks that were reverse-split after they had slipped below $5..."

http://m.barrons.com/articles/a/SB50001424052702303389204576484341965875236?mg=reno-barrons

I have been through reverse splits before. If SLTD ever reverse splits I will sell every share I own DAY ONE and won't look back. There is absolutely no reason to r/s. SLTD can meet every criteria for listing on a major index organically. If Jim Nelson chooses to r/s then it will tell me every thing I would need to know about how poorly the company wouldhe run. I put the chances (other than if commercialization fails) of an SLTD r/s at less than 5%.