InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 16
Posts 4022
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/11/2003

Re: MrBiff post# 9423

Thursday, 02/20/2014 11:57:55 AM

Thursday, February 20, 2014 11:57:55 AM

Post# of 34908
Have to correct myself: You are right, Pellicer has been mentioned. Nevertheless I have no problems with the fact that a license for such an important and famous name, has to cost money. I am even astonished that Pellicer did not receive those 5 mm shares for free - which weould not be unusual at all. Thus a price of 0.01 per shares is nothing but a theoretical perchase price for the book keeping. I prefer the name Pellicer in connection with Plandai ....insteed of a totally unknow Plandai which would have to fight for years until the world gets used to this companies name. I do not understand the problem with such a license and such a price! Maybe Plandai should ask GlaxoSmithKline for a license using their name....guess Plandai would have to offer 100 billion shares for .01 for such a licence.
And I would love it also ! Names and reputation costs money - that simple!