Followers | 53 |
Posts | 3489 |
Boards Moderated | 0 |
Alias Born | 02/05/2014 |
![](http://investorshub.advfn.com/images/default_ih_profile2_4848.jpg?cb=0)
Saturday, February 15, 2014 8:36:45 PM
So, I will try this again...
There are three events of interest from the court records:
1) 01/27/2014 at 04:00 pm in Department 48, Elizabeth Allen White, Presiding
Court Order - Court makes order
2) 02/14/2014 at 08:30 am in Department 47, Debre K. Weintraub, Presiding
Exparte proceeding - Matter is heard, matter continued
3) 02/14/2014 Ex-Parte Application (PPJ ENTERPRISE, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL )
Filed by Atty for Plaintiff and Cross-Deft
In entry #1 on 1/27, Judge Elizabeth White ordered the parties to hold a Settlement Conference to attempt to work through some of their differences. As best as we can tell, this was a pre-condition to the judge allowing the trial to move forward.
In entry #2 on 2/14, we see that the matter was heard (ie: Settlement Conference was held) by (Judge?) Debre K. Weintraub.
I am not clear if "Exparte proceeding" means that only one party (plaintiff PPJ Enterprises or defendant Grewal) attended, or if "Exparte proceeding" means that Debre K. Weintraub was the lone mediator present at the proceeding. I think that the first explanation is the most likely.
In entry #3, also on 2/14, plaintiff PPJ Enterprise files to continue the trial. Note that unlike in other filings, there was NOT a filing to continue (ie: push out past the current 2/26 date) the TRIAL DATES.
Judge White was the one who issued the order (#1 above) that the opposing parties shall attend a mediated settlement conference before the trial moves forward. Therefore, Judge White would have to approve moving forward with the trial satisfied that her order was followed. That would require a request to be approved by Judge White.
Because it was plaintiff PPJ Enterprise that filed such a request, I am thinking that defendant Grewal opted not to attend the Settlement Conference on 2/13. It would not make sense for plaintiff PPJ Enterprise to have filed for the request to move forward with the trial if defendant Grewal had attended the Settlement Conference, and not plaintiff PPJ Enterprise.
If I am correct, this also means that not only is Judge White likely to approve the request to proceed with the trial, but it would mean that defendant Grewal has not made any friends with the court by virtue of skipping the Settlement Conference.
Presumably, grifter_24 will be on top of verifying if I am correct when next Tuesday comes.
Only 7 more trading days until the trial starts on 2/26...
Glidelogic Corp. Becomes TikTok Shop Partner, Opening a New Chapter in E-commerce Services • GDLG • Jul 5, 2024 7:09 AM
Freedom Holdings Corporate Update; Announces Management Has Signed Letter of Intent • FHLD • Jul 3, 2024 9:00 AM
EWRC's 21 Moves Gaming Studios Moves to SONY Pictures Studios and Green Lights Development of a Third Upcoming Game • EWRC • Jul 2, 2024 8:00 AM
BNCM and DELEX Healthcare Group Announce Strategic Merger to Drive Expansion and Growth • BNCM • Jul 2, 2024 7:19 AM
NUBURU Announces Upcoming TV Interview Featuring CEO Brian Knaley on Fox Business, Bloomberg TV, and Newsmax TV as Sponsored Programming • BURU • Jul 1, 2024 1:57 PM
Mass Megawatts Announces $220,500 Debt Cancellation Agreement to Improve Financing and Sales of a New Product to be Announced on July 11 • MMMW • Jun 28, 2024 7:30 AM