PPJ Healthcare Enterprises Inc (PPJE)

[Ed the Trader]

Although I will admit that I could be interpreting this incorrectly, I see three entries in the court record that seem to be relevant:

1) 01/27/2014 at 04:00 pm in Department 48, Elizabeth Allen White, Presiding
Court Order - Court makes order

2) 02/14/2014 at 08:30 am in Department 47, Debre K. Weintraub, Presiding
Exparte proceeding - Matter is heard, matter continued

3) 02/14/2014 Ex-Parte Application (PPJ ENTERPRISE, INC.'S EX PARTE APPLICATION TO CONTINUE TRIAL )
Filed by Atty for Plaintiff and Cross-Deft

In entry #1 on 1/27, Judge White ordered the parties to hold a Settlement Conference to attempt to work through some of their differences.

In entry #2 on 2/14, we see that the matter was heard (ie: Settlement Conference was held). It is unclear to me if "Exparte proceeding" means that only one party attended.

In entry #3, also on 2/14, PPJ files to continue the trial. Note that unlike in other filings, there was NOT a filing to continue the TRIAL DATES. I am thinking this filing is a request to proceed with the trial as scheduled on 2/26, and that the filing would be necessary in response to the court order on 1/27 which stipulated that the opposing parties would engage in an attempt at a mediated settlement before the trial would proceed. Such a request to continue with the trial would especially be necessary in response to the 1/27 court order if only one party (presumably PPJ) opted to attend the Settlement Conference.