As I noted earlier, there's absolutely no guarantee the anything will appear in the NE JOURNAL, as is being hyped. The publication is very demanding and strict on anything that might previously been said before appearing in their publication, plus numerous other review factors/criteria.
Besides, possible publication, which is hoped to help,, just always opens the floodgates for critical peer review, sometimes touting a whole new approach of the science being used by actc. Remember, the competition for research dollars and peer recognition, is fierce and brutual, so don't expect just accolades by any means.
The other thing that bothers me is the apparent schizo approach Seeking Alpha appears to be using against ACTC and the publication is notorious for continuing follow up articles supporting their articles, to with, the unending articles on NBS and RAD most recently. My point is they, along with hostile peer reviewers,could be out in full force to damage actc's science and the share price.
Not good,imo, from a lot of past experiences.
