Well, they surely compete with CYPW head-to-head. Probably patent-for-patent as well. They only use 2 pistons, probably have no "thwappy" spider bearing and other goofy hi-maintenance parts. Looks simpler than CYPW's engine. I'll call 'em and see what they have actually produced.
I'll bet that I get straighter answers from them than I have gotten from CYPW even though I'm a shareholder. We'll soon see.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.