I would suggest that even the company refrains from calling it a checkpoint inhibitor - probably because it is not a 'brake remover' and because the animal model (and even human?) data on CD-27 inhibitors and agonists is at least somewhat mixed. (seemingly a common occurrence in many of these immune regulators) E.g. in one of the patients in the already published results it shrunk one tumor, but s/he sprouted multiple mets. And some tumors actually over-express CD70/27 implying in some circumstances it is a tumor promoter - not tumor inhibitor. Etc.
In toto I think the literature leans towards CD27 activation as being an inhibitor - but there is enough confusion to suggest a reasonable chance of some twists in the road. FWIW
BTW - the other factor that makes a comparison of Innate and CLDX not as simple as a comparison of market caps is that CLDX's assets are wholly owned. Lirilumab is not.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.