DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dr frudaky]

gunnabeoneday



I just noted your post pointing out the supposed errors of my ways and would like to respond. Please forgive my delay and hope it did not cause you any anticipation inconvenience.

With regard to the o/s increasing from 62 million to about 250 million, my calculator tells me that is about a fourfold or four times increase, hence my use of "400% increase." However, if you believe it would be more accurate, I will change what I posted to read "the present 250 million o/s is about four times the post r/s 62 million o/s."

With regard to the "800% decrease in the pps," my calculator also tells me that the current pps of .02 is about one eighth the r/s pps of .16, so we have suffered an eightfold or eight times decrease. However, if you believe it would be more accurate, I will change what I posted to read "the present .02 pps is about one-eighth the r/s pps of .16."

I hope this explanation is sufficient. Please let me know if any further changes or considerations are desired.

JMHO, and always happy to please with accuracy and facts!

dr f