Calypso Wireless (fka CLYW)

[HighRider]

I think you are correct. The second and third times I listened, the more it sounded better for Juren. He hit most of the points that needed to be made. I also agree the opposing counsel had nothing new to add and kept pronouncing inaccuracies such as the definition of a Piconet,as was specifically pointed out by Juren at the end. I don't think there is any question that the definition of Compromising was another on Juren's side. I would say Juren did about as good as we could expect. I don't know if you caught the comment and question to Tmob about Doctrine of Equivalents. This same court has made rulings on this basis and they were favorable to the patentee. Time will tell. GLTA