"Hennis is coming to this thing to speak, not about what was on the agenda, but about his own agenda."
Another odd comment. Isn't that exactly why guyer and rice and fearn were there for. Their own defense and agenda?
"If someone feels they are CEO material, do they come to the hearing wearing stretched out lavender sweat pants, dirty wore out sneakers, and needing a haircut?"
I don't know. But all the courts I worked in didn't have a explicit dress code.
What did guyer wear? His conductors uniform and baton? Or is he a ordained Rev, and wore a white collar? Perhaps by looking religious guyer hoped to garner sympathy from the judge.
Naa, judges try not to let appearances effect their 'judgement'.
"but there's a difference between style and just not giving a flip. First impressions are the lasting ones, and that was mine"
Well since guyer has shown he doesn't "give a flip" about you common shareholders, these impressions are pretty much meaningless to guyer and this group of lawsuits in general.
