InvestorsHub Logo
Post# of 252360
Next 10
Followers 56
Posts 1150
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/12/2005

Re: DewDiligence post# 23724

Friday, 02/10/2006 4:42:21 PM

Friday, February 10, 2006 4:42:21 PM

Post# of 252360
re: TELK

They were hammered on this in the breakout at JPM in January. They won't come out and say exactly how they've done it, but it is clearly:

(1) They will hold the data themselves until they have all three
(2) They have instructed the CRO to not do the analyses until all three triggers are hit.

The first is flat out wrong. The second is questionable and very problematic from a statistical standpoint unless their SAP with the FDA says something like "open the database when at least XXX patients" have had the event. Most SAP's I've read specify a specific number. (Others here can chime in if the SAPs they've done/read are different from my experience.)

PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE take what happened to CTIC investors as a caution against believing "longer is better." Even CTI management was saying that on conference calls and the only prospective statistically significant positive conclusion you can gain from those trials is you should go to Russia to be treated if you have lung cancer.


Unless otherwise indicated, this is the personal viewpoint of David Miller and not necessarily that of Biotech Stock Research, LLC

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.