Friday, January 31, 2014 4:53:12 PM
In fact, any institution, whether business, medical, or government, can always use BNP or BNF alongside more traditional accepted methods in order to get an early warning of a pathogen potentially being present. They can still wait for the confirmation from the other tests, but having that early warning could be invaluable. There's not much downside. The chances are low that a false positive ID would be made of a specific organism.
As you state, in the case of a food supplier it could save $millions (and possibly lives) by simply delaying a shipment pending confirmation by traditional methods.
Good Gaming Inc. Announces ViaOne Services' Intent to Purchase Up to 10% of Its Common Shares in the Open Market • GMER • Jan 16, 2025 8:30 AM
Avant Technologies and Ainnova Begin Implementing and Testing Advanced AI Algorithms for Early Detection of Additional Diseases • AVAI • Jan 16, 2025 8:00 AM
VOCODIA HOLDINGS INC. (OTCMKTS: VHAI) and TRACCOM INC. (OTCMKTS: TRCC) have signed an MOU to form a Joint Venture that will Revolutionize Event Monitoring with Narrative AI • VHAI • Jan 15, 2025 2:53 PM
UAV Corp (OTC: UMAV) Engages Legal Counsel to Initiate Uplisting Process with Ultimate Goal of NASDAQ Listing • UMAV • Jan 15, 2025 8:30 AM
HealthLynked Welcomes Jeremy Daniel as Chief Financial Officer • HLYK • Jan 15, 2025 8:00 AM
Zefiro Methane Corp. Subsidiary Awarded Slate of Government of Ohio-Funded Environmental Remediation Projects • ZEFI • Jan 15, 2025 7:33 AM