Okay, let's consider this....
"Very few recent PRs--there has been barely a few 'heartbeat' PR's, compared to what we were getting."
What about Verizon PR? Or what about the 8 PRs in the month of January! That's like one PR every 3.5 days!!!!
"Dumping without trying to raise the pps doesn't seem to make much sense..."
See my above comment about the numerous PRs in January and pay special attention to the Verizon PR. There was an attempt to raise the PPS. AND, I've posted too many posts in the past in regards to people who insist that a company would not dump at a lower PPS. The argument that a company would not dump at a lower PPS is ridiculous. The company will dump when it HAS to dump...it can't just wait around for the PPS to go up -- if it's dumping it's because it needs the money NOW!!! Also, why would a company wait for the PPS to go up when it can just dump purportionallly more shares? In other words, if the company needed 1 million dollars, why wait for the stock to go to $1 in order to dump a million shares, when you can dump 10 million shares at $.10? Frank has control of the AS, therefore he doesn't need to wait for a higher price...he just dumps that many more shares. Also, the company can't manipulate the PPS like snapping its fingers and having the PPS go up so it can dump. That's ridiculous. Frank is as stuck in the mud as we are right now. All he can do is continue to promote buying interest so he can dump. The price is out of his control (too much dillution), so all he can hope for is to find a buyer...that's why he released 8 PRs in January!
"...especially since the stock is undervalued."
Why do you keep insisting that the company is undervalued??? where do you get that information? And why is it that you don't account for the huge debt the company is probably in. The company can be worth 1 billion dollars for all anyone cares, but if they have 10 billion in debt, they are worthless to the shareholders. Please account for debt when you give a valuation on the company. And before you say that there is no debt...why then would Frank raise the A/S and dilute if the company is financially strong? Consider dillution a clear indication of debt....and dilution works just like debt in this case to kill the PPS.
"Any concrete news, like a real audit, would jump the pps a bit."
Not if the audit is horrendous and shows massive dillution. Maybe that's why Frank is stalling?
"I don't know what is going on--the simple explanation of dumping and dilution only makes partial sense--not the whole story."
Her it is again! What's so bad about accepting the simple explanation and the one that makes the most sense. Why does there have to be "something else going on"? What would that "something else" even be!!! Isn't it clear that ALL of this can be explained by dillution? What's the problem with that? After all, dilution is probably a more positive explanation than any "something else" that might come along.
AI
